Hi Tom,
For Curves you also need a conversion to amber ASCII trajectories, so 
its  also not perfect from that point of view .. I don't know how large 
and how many are your trajectories, but I did not see a major time 
limitation by having a temporary conversion to ASCII trajectories during 
an automated workflow that ultimately runs Curves on these ASCII mdcrd 
file (deleting them afterwords)...
But, sure, I see the point that if cpptraj can do everything in one 
step, it will be more efficient .. Maybe I should also give it a try 
....especially as Daniel mentioned it can actually do everything Curves 
does  ....
Best wishes
Vlad
On 05/26/2016 02:49 PM, Thomas C. Bishop wrote:
> Good to hear from you Vlad.
>
> I  had been using X3DNA but last  I checked 3DNA could not read DCD's 
> only pdbs so processing is  slow.
> ( I have some vmd scripts that automate 3DNA analysis if anyone's 
> interested... but it's not terribly efficient)
>
> We tested cpptraj yesterday and I was _amazed_ at how fast it is 
> compared to 3DNA.
> cpptraj  has advantage over Curves/3DNA that it can do a lot of 
> analysis in one run.
>
> I still need to compare to what Curves  offers.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> On 05/26/2016 02:33 AM, Vlad Cojocaru wrote:
>> Dear Tom,
>>
>> We are using Curves or X3DNA to do this type of analysis. These 
>> programs recognize automatically the base pairs and give you all data 
>> you need regarding the DNA helix. As I don't have experience with 
>> nastruct in Cpptraj, I cannot say if the functionality is as good as 
>> in these 2 programs but as these 2 were made especially for this type 
>> of analysis, I'd expect the functionality is superior to Cpptraj 
>> which is a more general analysis tool. But sure, I may be wrong ...
>>
>> Best wishes
>> Vlad
>>
>> On 05/26/2016 01:31 AM, Thomas C. Bishop wrote:
>>>     Dear Amber,
>>>     I'm using CPPTRAJ to analyze some simulations w/ dsDNA and want 
>>> to extract
>>>     helical parameter data w/ nastruct.
>>>     Is there any other  method than using a reference structure for 
>>> having
>>>     nastruct identify the base pairs.
>>>     Specifically can I tell nastruct which residues are paired with 
>>> which?
>>>     Pointers to tools for statistically summaries of the results 
>>> would be much
>>>     appreciated.
>>>     Thanks in advance,
>>>     Tom
>>>
>>
>
> -- 
> *******************************
>     Thomas C. Bishop
>      Tel: 318-257-5209
>      Fax: 318-257-3823
>     www.latech.edu/~bishop
> ********************************
-- 
Dr. Vlad Cojocaru
Computational Structural Biology Laboratory
Department of Cell and Developmental Biology
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine
Röntgenstrasse 20, 48149 Münster, Germany
Tel: +49-251-70365-324; Fax: +49-251-70365-399
Email: vlad.cojocaru[at]mpi-muenster.mpg.de
http://www.mpi-muenster.mpg.de/43241/cojocaru
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu May 26 2016 - 07:30:02 PDT