I personally prefer Ubuntu and haven't had any issues with it so far,
though I know some people dislike the constant update cycle that it goes
through.
Other than that, CentOS or other RedHat variants for clusters, though I
think there's at least one cluster here which is running Ubuntu. I also
believe CentOS goes through a yearly update cycle, which might be something
to also consider.
Best,
Kenneth
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Robert Molt <rwmolt07.gmail.com> wrote:
> Good morning in the USA, good afternoon in Europe...
>
> I have to choose a flavor of Linux for a new cluster my research group
> is building, intending to run Amber with GPU execution (among other
> things). I am not used to making system admin-style choices and am
> soliciting advice.
>
> I am sure Amber can be properly compiled on many forms of Linux, with
> varying ease. I cannot get RedHat, unfortunately. Some of the free forms
> of Linux suffer from a lack of stability (constant updates). Do Amber
> veterans have strong opinions about a "best" overall choice in
> Linux-style to go with for computers intended to compile Amber? I am
> only experienced in RedHat, Ubuntu, and Mint but am happy to adapt to
> any flavor.
>
> --
> Dr. Robert Molt Jr.
> r.molt.chemical.physics.gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Ask yourselves, all of you, what power would hell have if those imprisoned
here could not dream of heaven?
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri May 20 2016 - 07:30:03 PDT