Hello everyone,
I am trying to perform an AM1-BCC charge fit using antechamber. I am trying
to simulate paracetamol. To obtain an initial coordinate mol2 file, to use
for subsequent charge fitting,  I used the ZINC database (as per suggested
via swissparm.ch). However, when the charges are fit using either
antechamber -i acet.mol2 -fi mol2 -o acet_bcc.mol2 -fo mol2 -nc 0 -c bcc -s
2
or
antechamber -i acet.mol2 -fi mol2 -o acet_bcc.mol2 -fo mol2 --c bcc -s 2
I obtain a paracetemol molecule whos net charge is -0.001 e. This seems
large to me. I intend to simulate upwards of ~2500 paracetemol molecules,
which would yield a net charge -2.5 e. I was wondering if someone could
comment on what would cause antechamber to not return a neutral molecule.
My initial guess was perhaps the initial configuration was poor, but given
that its from the ZINC database, I dont see how the initial configuration
could be that bad. Could someone please help? Here is my initial acet.mol2
file which I obtained from the ZINC database. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
.<TRIPOS>MOLECULE
ZINC18274777
   20    20     0     0     0
SMALL
USER_CHARGES
.<TRIPOS>ATOM
      1 C1         -2.1938    1.4701    0.6085 C.3       1 <0>
-0.1738
      2 C2         -2.1691   -0.0367    0.6077 C.2       1 <0>
0.5100
      3 O1         -3.0611   -0.6582    1.1456 O.2       1 <0>
-0.5253
      4 N1         -1.1558   -0.6938    0.0094 N.am      1 <0>
-0.6760
      5 C3         -1.0811   -2.0905    0.0916 C.ar      1 <0>
0.1315
      6 C4          0.1554   -2.7160    0.1778 C.ar      1 <0>
-0.1278
      7 C5          0.2283   -4.0925    0.2593 C.ar      1 <0>
-0.1267
      8 C6         -0.9336   -4.8504    0.2546 C.ar      1 <0>
0.0907
      9 C7         -2.1693   -4.2261    0.1680 C.ar      1 <0>
-0.1267
     10 C8         -2.2439   -2.8493    0.0927 C.ar      1 <0>
-0.1043
     11 O2         -0.8611   -6.2059    0.3344 O.3       1 <0>
-0.4991
     12 H1         -3.0822    1.8186    1.1352 H         1 <0>
0.0977
     13 H2         -1.3026    1.8478    1.1098 H         1 <0>
0.0926
     14 H3         -2.2144    1.8337   -0.4188 H         1 <0>
0.0926
     15 H4         -0.4783   -0.1997   -0.4782 H         1 <0>
0.4131
     16 H5          1.0601   -2.1261    0.1808 H         1 <0>
0.1308
     17 H6          1.1901   -4.5792    0.3264 H         1 <0>
0.1337
     18 H7         -3.0735   -4.8168    0.1636 H         1 <0>
0.1330
     19 H8         -3.2062   -2.3631    0.0301 H         1 <0>
0.1433
     20 H9         -0.8763   -6.5480    1.2387 H         1 <0>
0.3908
.<TRIPOS>BOND
     1    1    2 1
     2    1   12 1
     3    1   13 1
     4    1   14 1
     5    2    3 2
     6    2    4 am
     7    4    5 1
     8    4   15 1
     9    5   10 ar
    10    5    6 ar
    11    6    7 ar
    12    6   16 1
    13    7    8 ar
    14    7   17 1
    15    8    9 ar
    16    8   11 1
    17    9   10 ar
    18    9   18 1
    19   10   19 1
    20   11   20 1
Regards,
Conor Parks
B.S.E in Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2012
PhD candidate in Chemical Engineering, Purdue University
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue May 03 2016 - 20:30:03 PDT