Re: [AMBER] Align namelist for direct dipolar coupling restraints

From: David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:18:05 -0400

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016, Francisco Corzana López wrote:

> I would like to know the convention in AMBER for the Euler angles.

> I mean, in the align namelist for direct dipolar coupling restraints,
> some of the variables to be defined are s11, s12,s13,s22 and s23 that
> are the Cartesian components of the alignment tensor.

> Are them in ay’z format?

I don't understand the question. The alignment tensor is (as you note) given
in *Cartesian* framework, 1==x, 2==y, 3==z. The person who wrote the code
doesn't understand Euler angles.

...hope this helps...if not, please try to explain your question more fully.

...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Mar 30 2016 - 10:30:03 PDT
Custom Search