Re: [AMBER] energy calculation with cpptraj based on chamber topology file

From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:07:48 -0700

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Song-Ho Chong <chong.sookmyung.ac.kr> wrote:
>
> I just wonder whether 'eander' accepts one or two masks.
> The whole purpose that I wrote new codes is to compute energy
> for specific regions and for interaction between two specific regions
> of interest (since if only the total energy was what I want I could
> use sander API).

Actually it currently uses no masks - the sander API has not
progressed to the point where energy decomposition is easy to do. It's
on the to-do list. Right now the 'esander' action basically serves the
same function as 'imin=5' in sander, but with cpptraj's trajectory
format parsers and parallelism.

-Dan

>
> Song-Ho
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber



-- 
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 307
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-6208 (Fax)
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Mar 10 2016 - 08:30:03 PST
Custom Search