Re: [AMBER] GB Parameterization

From: David A Case <david.case.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 08:42:11 -0500

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016, Taylor Harville wrote:

> The minimization ran correctly for these systems, but the heating
> of each full system would always blow up at step one.

Just to add to what Carlos already said: the energy at the end of the
minimization should exactly equal the energy at step 1 of MD. What you
describe above makes is sound like there is some difference between your
minimization parameters and your MD parameters. Look carefully (be sure to
set ntpr=1) to confirm that your starting energy for MD matches your ending
energy from minimzation.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Mar 04 2016 - 06:00:04 PST
Custom Search