> On Jul 22, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Albert <mailmd2011.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> thanks a lot for such clear explanations.
>
> I noticed that I have specify the receptor charge explicitly otherwise
> it would be some problem for mmpbsa.py to get the correct values.
>
> BTW, does the latest amber support QM/PBSA now?
No. And that is not in the plans as far as I know.
>
> thx again.
>
>
>> On 07/22/2015 01:38 PM, Jason Swails wrote:
>> This says that the 9th CPU (first CPU is rank 0) failed when trying to
>> compute the QM/MM-GBSA energy with the complex topology file. This is
>> *all* that the above error message states. The error message generated by
>> sander will have been placed inside the _MMPSBA_complex_gb.mdout.8 file.
>> The error message there will hopefully give you more information that will
>> help solve the problem.
>>
>> One word of warning is that picking a QM region is difficult if you plan on
>> allowing bonds to cross the QM-MM boundary. The standard choices allowed
>> by MMPBSA.py may be inadequate when it comes to picking the QM region, as
>> it only allows you to pick residues that will be treated with QM. For
>> protein systems, this will mean that amide bonds -- which are conjugated pi
>> systems -- will be cut along the QM-MM boundary, which might lead to
>> difficulties in converging the QM/MM SCF.
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jul 22 2015 - 08:00:02 PDT
