Re: [AMBER] Why the entropy contribution from quasi-harmonic and normal mode methods are so different?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Hannes Loeffler <Hannes.Loeffler.stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:52:11 +0100

http://archive.ambermd.org/201207/0319.html

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jul 01 2015 - 03:00:03 PDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jason Swails: "Re: [AMBER] Output format in sander"
Previous message: George Green: "Re: [AMBER] Rms fitting to a reference structure with a differnt number atoms to top file"
In reply to: wliu: "[AMBER] Why the entropy contribution from quasi-harmonic and normal mode methods are so different?"
Next in thread: wliu: "Re: [AMBER] Why the entropy contribution from quasi-harmonic and normal mode methods are so different?"
Reply: wliu: "Re: [AMBER] Why the entropy contribution from quasi-harmonic and normal mode methods are so different?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

Custom Search