This question has been raised and discussed before. You can find these
threads (and answers) by googling that warning message. For example, this
thread: http://archive.ambermd.org/201401/0010.html
HTH,
Jason
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:13 AM, George Tzotzos <gtzotzos.me.com> wrote:
> I’d appreciate any suggestions regarding the warning message below (e.g.
> possible reasons, importance, workarounds, etc.)
>
> GENERALIZED BORN:
>
> WARNING: INCONSISTENCIES EXIST WITHIN INTERNAL POTENTIAL
> TERMS. THE VALIDITY OF THESE RESULTS ARE HIGHLY QUESTIONABLE
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> George
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Jun 15 2015 - 06:30:04 PDT
