[AMBER] tinker_to_amber doesn't like AMOEBA reference frames for chloride

From: Baker, Lewis Robert <lrb36.pitt.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:30:02 +0000

Hello,

I'm trying to to simulate acetate and guanidinium in AMBER using the AMOEBA force field. My system contains some Cl- counterions. When I attempted to use tinker_to_amber to generate topology files, I got the following output:


 frcfieldfile =
 ../amoeba09_mp2_aug-cc-pVTZ.prm

 found a-axis = 57.0000000000000
 found b-axis = 57.0000000000000
 found c-axis = 57.0000000000000
 num_xyz_atoms = 18288
 numres = 5692
 num_atoms = 18288
 vdw: num_vdw_types = 9
 num_bonds = 12596
 num_urey_bradley = 5492
 num_tot_angles = 8510
 num regular, trigonal angles = 8504 6
 num_out_of_plane_bends = 6
 numtor = 3612
 num1,num_torsions = 3612 4736
 no success finding Stretch-Torsions
 no success finding Pi-Orbital Torsions
 num_stretch_bends = 1510
 no success finding Torsion-Torsions
 num_molecules = 5692
 num_multipoles = 18288
 unknown frame type: ftype = None

The associated .prmtop and .inpcrd files were empty. After inspecting the .analout file, I discovered that all of the Cl- counterions all have the following multipole parameters:

  (Atom #) (Atom #) 0 0 None -1.00000
                                                    0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
                                                    0.00000
                                                    0.00000 0.00000
                                                    0.00000 0.00000 0.00000

where "None" designates the type of local reference frame. This seems appropriate within the AMOEBA framework, but tinker_to_amber doesn't appear to like it. How can I work around this?

Thanks for your help!

Kind regards,
Lewis Baker

University of Pittsburgh
Chong Group, Department of Chemistry

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jun 11 2015 - 11:00:03 PDT
Custom Search