Please do not ask a new question by replying to an old thread. It adds
confusion and makes it harder to search for the answer in the future.
Instead, send a new email to amber.ambermd.org and pick a descriptive
subject.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Antonios Kolocouris <ankol.pharm.uoa.gr>
wrote:
> is there any comparative benchmark in ns/day, for running amber MD of DHFR
> all atoms (~24000 atoms) with GPU970 (1660 cores) and 980 (2048 cores)? I
> mean to decide if there is a big difference between these cards on relative
> efficiency in ns/day.
​There was a recent thread comparing the GTX 780 (2304 CUDA cores) with a
GTX 760 (1652 CUDA cores), and the latter had ~1/3 of the performance of
the former.
Based on these results, I would expect the 970 vs. 980 comparison to be
closer, but the 980 to still be measurably faster (say, around 1.5x to 2x
faster). If someone else has actual numbers, hopefully they will chime in,
but this at least gives a baseline.
HTH,
Jason
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jun 05 2015 - 05:00:02 PDT
