On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Brian Radak <brian.radak.accts.gmail.com>
wrote:
> Is the development branch really that bleeding edge? Goodness, I wish I had
> known that in year 3 of my PhD!
>
No, it's not really that bleeding edge, generally (i.e., it's not *always*
broken -- in fact, it's broken far less often than not). FWIW, I almost
exclusively use the development tree in my work. I don't see the issues
you were seeing with pmemd.cuda, so I suspect something was wrong with your
particular snapshot.
> Using a fully patched release of 14 everything now runs without error. I
> get some "possible failures" with energy differences in the 4th decimal
> place - I expect these can be safely ignored.
>
Yes.
All the best,
Jason
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Mar 26 2015 - 11:30:04 PDT
