Dear Amber Users,
I have run a 100ns MD of a protein. Following is the .in file i was using the
run the simulation
----
100ps MD
&cntrl
imin = 0, irest = 1, ntx = 7,
ntb = 2, pres0 = 1.0, ntp = 1,
taup = 2.0,
cut = 10.0, ntr = 0,
ntc = 2, ntf = 2,ig = -1,
tempi = 300.0, temp0 = 300.0,
ntt = 3, gamma_ln = 1.0,
nstlim = 50000, dt = 0.002,
ntpr = 100, ntwx = 100, ntwr = 1000
/
----
However, when I am analysing the trajectories, I am facing some issues.
(1) After completion of the production run of 100ns, I am using the first frame
of the production dynamics to obtain a RMSD using cpptraj. The following are
the commands that I am using for the same.
---RMSD.in---
trajin ./1abc-md1.crd
.
.
.
trajin ./1abc-md1000.crd
strip :WAT
center :1-325 mass origin
image origin center familiar
rms first out rms-test.dat :1-325.CA
atomicfluct out per-res-fluct.dat :1-325 byres
go
------------
The resulting output file is showing a blowup of rmsd to 19.6556 Angstrom for
almost 19 frames in the simulation around the 80th ns.
(please see data below) The rest of the RMSD data, does not show any such
drastic deviations. It stays in the 2.0 to 3.0 Angstrom range.
----RMSD DATA---
399601 2.7011
399602 2.6962
399603 2.7055
399604 2.6971
399605 2.7137
399606 2.7178
399607 2.6781
399608 2.6682
399609 2.6534
399610 2.6402
399611 19.6556 <---
399612 19.6556 <---
399613 19.6556 <---
399614 19.6556 <---
399615 19.6556 <---
399616 19.6556 <---
399617 19.6556 <---
399618 19.6556 <---
399619 19.6556 <---
399620 19.6556 <---
399621 19.6556 <---
399622 19.6556 <---
399623 19.6556 <---
399624 19.6556 <---
399625 19.6556 <---
399626 19.6556 <---
399627 19.6556 <---
399628 19.6556 <---
399629 19.6556 <---
399630 2.5816
399631 2.5835
399632 2.5920
399633 2.5742
399634 2.5583
399635 2.5812
------
What could be happening here ? Why this drastic difference in the RMSD ? What
was peculiar is, nowhere else in the simulation was there such a leap in RMSD.
(2) When I traced back the frames to the corresponding MD simulation, I tried
visualizing the relevant mdcrd file in VMD. This produced visualization of only
the first nine frames i.e from frame number 399601-399610. At the next step, VMD
crashed. Why is this happening ?
(3) Next to probe further, I tried to see whether there were some issues with
the protein structure in these frames. When I tried using cpptraj for the
extraction of PDB files for these frames, I got the following error message :
----------
1uh7-wat-md801.crd (1-500, 1)
0% Warning: For PDB, box coords for first frame only will be written to CRYST1.
Warning: Frame 11 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 12 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 13 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 14 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 15 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 16 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 17 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 18 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 19 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 20 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 21 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 22 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 23 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 24 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 25 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 26 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 27 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 28 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
Warning: Frame 29 coords 1 & 2 overlap at origin; may be corrupt.
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Complete.
----------
Are these two issues related ?
What seems to be going wrong here in the simulation? What can i do to rectify
this error?
Please help.
Regards,
Anasuya Dighe
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore,
INDIA
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Mar 10 2015 - 03:00:02 PDT