Hi Jason
Thanks for the help. Will surely look this up :)
Regards
Suchetana
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 09:31 +0530, Suchetana Gupta wrote:
> > Hi Dan
> > Thanks for the suggestions. I tried using small residue selections and
> they
> > are working fine in Amber12. But the moment I increase the number of
> > residues, the output file doesn't contain the data in the correct matrix
> > format. I am sure I am getting 120x120 values, but the output is not in a
> > matrix format. I am attaching a screenshot if it helps.
> > Any help would be appreciated.
>
> You solved the problem exporting it to a spreadsheet-style format, but
> I'll just point out what was happening here. The editor you were using
> was employing "wrapping" -- that is, 120 numbers did not fit on a single
> line, so it "wrapped" those that wouldn't fit to the next line on the
> screen (but *not* the next line in the actual file). If you use the
> left and down arrows in an editor like vi or emacs, you can tell where
> one line stops and the next starts.
>
> Most editors give you the option to turn *off* wrapping (so the file
> scrolls left-and-right as well as up-and-down). Just google your editor
> and "turn off wrapping" to look for instructions.
>
> HTH,
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> BioMaPS,
> Rutgers University
> Postdoctoral Researcher
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jan 21 2015 - 21:30:02 PST
