On Fri, Oct 17, 2014, Himanshu Joshi wrote:
>
> n="" does not work for wc_helix giving segmentation fault.
> So I have to go with n =NULL;
OK...my bad.
>
> Somehow wc_helix returns the complimentary string to the other
> sting if one is giviven NULL value as it is clear by output of this
> program.
Now you know; it could be that the design of wc_helix() should be changed, so
that the string "n" is not modified. But for now, you cannot make that
assumption, and hence need to re-initialize the string before each call to
wc_helix().
....dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Oct 17 2014 - 06:00:04 PDT
