Re: [AMBER] mismatch pdb files when created using ambpdb and savepdb

From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 07:43:30 -0600

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Thomas Cheatham <tec3.utah.edu> wrote:
>
> ambpdb is an old program and technically is not doing the wrong thing
> since the PDB format only allows 4-digits for the residue number. You can
> try to fix the program to how you think it should be behave or find a work
> around (such as to use CPPTRAJ or an alternative coordinate format).

Actually cpptraj behaves the same way as ambpdb in this respect:
residue numbers are wrapped to 1 when they become greater than 9999 in
PDB format. However, you can use cpptraj to write out in mol2 format,
which doesn't have the same issue.

-Dan

-- 
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 307
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-6208 (Fax)
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Sep 10 2014 - 07:00:02 PDT
Custom Search