[AMBER] what's the difference between imin=1 and imin=5 when performing minimizations on structures from MD trajectory

From: ye renlo <renloye.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:18:56 +0800

Dear AMBER users,
  When I finished a MD simulation, I want to perform energy minimization on
some structures in MD trajectory, now I have two methods to do that.

 1. extract desired frames from trajectory and save the frames as *rst*
files, set *imin=1* in control file

 2. extract desired frames from trajectory and save the frames as *crd*
files, set *imin=5* in control file, use -c and -y flags for sander

 Other parameters are same for both methods

  for imin=5, the following important note is presented in amber manual:
      **IMPORTANT CAVEAT: The input coordinate file used (-c <inpcrd>)
should be the same as the input coordinate file used to generate the
original trajectory.
      **This is because *sander sets up parameters for PME from the box
coordinates in the input coordinate file*.

My questions are:
 1. What does it mean "*sander sets up parameters for PME from the box
coordinates in the input coordinate file*"? What if I chose a different
<inpcrd> for -c flag(i.g., md rst file)
   rather than the original <inpcrd> file generated by Leap?

 2. I have tried two methods mentioned above and finds that the first
method with "*rst file,imin=1*" gives a lower final enery than the second
method with "*crd file, imin=5*".
    Could someone tell me what's the difference between imin=1 and imin=5
when performing minimizations on structures from MD trajectory

Many thanks!
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Aug 01 2014 - 01:30:03 PDT
Custom Search