On Jul 18, 2014, at 1:59 PM, menwer momo <masalmeh2007.yahoo.com> wrote:
> is it ok if I say that this mutation might have led to relaxation of the alpha helix in which it exist , which might led to other favorable electrostatic interactions between its neighboring atoms.
It's best only to say that if you have actual structural arguments to back this up (like certain distances, for example). After all, you should have the trajectories to do this analysis.
> It did also decreased the unfavorable electrostatic contribution to solvation as estimated by GB. as the positive value for this one became smaller.
--
Jason M. Swails
BioMaPS,
Rutgers University
Postdoctoral Researcher
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jul 18 2014 - 14:30:02 PDT
