Interesting, can you email me, OFF THE LIST, the 9mer and 12mer prmtop
and inpcrd files to take a look?
Ray
--
Ray Luo, Ph.D.
Professor,
Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics, and
Biomedical Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3900
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:27 AM, JPB <jpb.q4md-forcefieldtools.org> wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> I am performing free energy calculation with MMPBSA.py.
> In one system with the Poisson Boltzmann model,
> the van der Waals energy (VDWAALS) and the electrostatic
> energy (EEL) are not taken into account.
> In the FINAL_RESULTS_MMPBSA.dat file the lines devoted to
> VDWAALS and EEL do not appear and it is also surprising
> that for the ENPOLAR contribution "Std. Dev."
> and "Sd. Err. of Mean" equal 0.00
>
> In the _MMPBSA_complex_pb.mdout.i files, one can read:
> eff.c(2829) enb --> 0.000
> eff.c(2830) eel --> 0.000
> eff.c(2831) e_pb --> 0.000
>
> In the meantime in the same job these two contributions are computed
> when using the generalized Born model.
>
> It seems that something somewhere turns off the computation of electrostatic
> and van der Waals energies.
> My system is an oligomer made of 12 molecular units.
> I performed the same computations with oligomers of 1, 2, 4, 6, and 9
> molecular units and these two contributions were computed.
> I don't know where to look for the origin of this problem with the 12-unit
> system.
> Any help is welcome.
>
> Cheers.
> JPB.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Jun 27 2014 - 10:00:03 PDT