Hi everyone,
I'm working on some new protein force fields which have distinct backbone /
sidechain parameters for different amino acids. My parameterizations are
done using Gromacs, which allows atom-specific bonded interactions (i.e.
overriding the values that come from atom classes).
I don't see this functionality in AMBER, and it looks like the ff99sb-ildn
and ff12sb models have extra atom classes to accommodate the extra torsions.
Since I plan to port my force fields to AMBER, I'd like your advice on how
to do this most effectively.
What is the best way to implement residue-specific backbone and side chain
parameters? Should this be done by adding many atom classes? Is it even
possible to add on the order of 100 atom classes?
Thanks,
- Lee-Ping
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jun 10 2014 - 10:30:03 PDT
