Re: [AMBER] aligning

From: Jio M <jiomm.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 08:22:27 -0800 (PST)

Hi

Thanks for consideration. I have one confusion. I want to do some analysis on this Z axis aligned structures in a trajectory but the same time these structures should have best overlap. I am confused what I should do first?

a) Option 1: First best fit the structures with some reference (does this rms in cpptraj write traj of these strucutres? not sure though) and align them later along Z axis, But this may cause individual snapshot be shifted  somewhat which won't be best fit anymore. Somewhat it should look like this:

trajin test.trj
reference test.inpcrd
rms reference mass :1-280
principal dorotation
trajout temp.trj

b) Option 2: First I do alignment along Z axis and later best rmsd fit but again same problem.

trajin test.trj
principal dorotation
reference test.inpcrd
rms reference mass :1-280
trajout temp.trj

thanks
Jio




On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:38 PM, Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com> wrote:
 
Hi,



On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Jio M <jiomm.yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear Daniel
>Thanks I noted dorotation but was doing some mistake (I guess may be spellings).How dorotation knows along which (X, Y  or Z) to be aligned. Now my molecule aligned, more or less, along Z ('more or less' because its not fully symmterical).
>
>Is Z default, can we change default
>

The code will align the eigenvector with the largest eigenvalue along the Z axis. There is currently no option to change this, although that's a good idea and will go on my to-do list.


-Dan

 
-- 
-------------------------
Daniel R. Roe, PhD
Department of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Utah
30 South 2000 East, Room 201
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5820
http://home.chpc.utah.edu/~cheatham/
(801) 587-9652
(801) 585-6208 (Fax) 
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Feb 26 2014 - 08:30:03 PST
Custom Search