thanks very much for this info. As an amber novice, this kind of received
knowledge is very useful.
hjm
On Wednesday, September 25, 2013 04:19:07 PM Jason Swails wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:42 PM, harry mangalam
<harry.mangalam.uci.edu>wrote:
> > Is there a general agreement on which is the better approach?
>
> With Amber you have no choice. There is very little OpenMP in Amber 11 and
> the main simulation engines exclusively use MPI (in all versions). It
> still operates on shared memory machines, but unless the MPI implementation
> is _very_ clever and aggressively optimizes, each thread will have its own
> memory space.
<deletia>
---
Harry Mangalam - Research Computing, OIT, Rm 225 MSTB, UC Irvine
[m/c 2225] / 92697 Google Voice Multiplexer: (949) 478-4487
415 South Circle View Dr, Irvine, CA, 92697 [shipping]
MSTB Lat/Long: (33.642025,-117.844414) (paste into Google Maps)
---
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Sep 25 2013 - 14:30:03 PDT
