Re: [AMBER] Gaussian charges in xleap

From: David Case <dacase.rci.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:22:45 -0600

On Aug 23, 2013, at 5:20 AM, HIMANSHU JOSHI <himanshuphy87.gmail.com> wrote:

> Since antechamber gave the different atom types to the atoms,which is not
> matching to the pdb structure generated before

Thisnis wrong: leap is only comparing atom *names* between the pdb file and the library
file. These do have to match. It would help ifnyou could be more explicit about exactly what error you are seeing. But you can probably see the source of the problem yourself, by comparing the atom and residue names in the pdb and library files.

...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Aug 23 2013 - 07:30:03 PDT
Custom Search