Re: [AMBER] antechamber dCTP

From: YZ Qin <yzqin.67.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:35:02 -0500

Thank you Francois, your suggestion is really helpful!

After running scipt1.ff, I get a dCTP2.mol2 file. Then I run the following
command

parmchk -i dCTP2.mol2 -f mol2 -o dCTP2.frcmod

and get the dCTP2.frcmod as the following:


**********************

remark goes here
MASS
O 16.000 0.434 same as o
P 30.970 1.538 same as p4
H 1.008 0.161 same as hn
C 12.010 0.616 same as c
N 14.010 0.530 same as n

BOND
O -P 456.40 1.503 same as o -p4
O -C 648.00 1.214 same as c -o
O -H 0.00 0.000 ATTN, need revision
C -H 0.00 0.000 ATTN, need revision
C -C 290.10 1.550 same as c -c
C -N 478.20 1.345 same as c -n
N -H 410.20 1.009 same as hn-n

ANGLE
O -P -O 72.010 117.220 same as o -p4-o
P -O -P 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
O -C -C 67.160 120.990 same as c -c -o
O -C -H 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
P -O -C 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
H -O -C 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
C -C -H 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
C -C -C 62.300 111.680 same as c -c -c
C -O -C 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
C -N -C 65.330 127.140 same as c -n -c
H -C -N 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
C -C -N 67.530 112.140 same as c -c -n
H -C -H 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need revision
O -C -N 75.830 122.030 same as n -c -o
N -C -N 74.800 113.380 same as n -c -n
H -N -H 39.730 117.850 same as hn-n -hn
H -N -C 48.395 122.495 Calculated with empirical approach

DIHE
O -P -O -P 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
O -P -O -C 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
O -C -C -C 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
O -C -C -H 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
O -C -C -O 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
P -O -C -C 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
P -O -C -H 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
H -O -C -C 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
H -O -C -H 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
C -C -C -H 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
C -C -C -C 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
C -O -C -C 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
C -O -C -H 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
C -N -C -N 1 2.500 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -n
-X
C -N -C -O 1 2.500 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -n
-X
C -N -C -H 1 2.500 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -n
-X
C -N -C -C 1 2.500 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -n
-X
H -C -C -H 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
H -C -C -N 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
C -C -C -N 1 0.300 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -c
-X
C -O -C -N 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 ATTN, need
revision
H -N -C -N 1 2.500 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -n
-X
H -N -C -C 1 2.500 180.000 2.000 same as X -c -n
-X

IMPROPER
C -H -C -O 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
C -H -C -H 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
C -C -C -H 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
H -H -C -O 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
C -H -N -H 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
C -N -C -N 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
N -N -C -O 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
C -C -N -C 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value
C -H -C -N 1.1 180.0 2.0 Using default
value

NONBON
  O 1.6612 0.2100 same as o
  P 2.1000 0.2000 same as p4
  H 0.6000 0.0157 same as hn
  C 1.9080 0.0860 same as c
  N 1.8240 0.1700 same as n

*******************************

By "missing values", I mean those values set to "0" and marked with ATTN.

Did I miss something?


Thank you so much!




On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:55 AM, FyD <fyd.q4md-forcefieldtools.org> wrote:

> Yangzhong Qin,
>
> > I did try the F90. I can generate a dCTP2.mol file. Howerver, there are a
> > not of missing values in the frcmod file. Any suggstions on def
>
> there is a frcmod file:
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDDB/projects/F-90/script3.ff
>
> if you to use the script1.ff
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDDB/projects/F-90/script1.ff
>
> you need to apply different commands before to use this script1.ff:
> perl -p -i.old -e 's/\#\#\!\# //g' script1.ff
> grep -v "to be replaced by the correct tripos" script1.ff >
> script1-new.ff
>
> Does it help?
>
> by missing values - what do you mean?
> could you provide the error message generated by LEaP?
>
> regards, Francois
>
>
> > On Thursday, March 7, 2013, FyD wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Yangzhong Qin,
> >>
> >> You could use R.E.D. or R.E.D. Server at q4md-forcefieldtools.org.
> >> & you can find dCTP in R.E.DD.B.; please see:
> >> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDDB/projects/F-90/
> >>
> >> More generally using sqm to directly optimize the geometry of dCTP is
> >> unlikely to lead to a representative conformation in this case
> >> (multiple negative charges).
> >>
> >> regards, Francois
> >>
> >>
> >> > I am trying to study a protein-DNA-dCTP complex.
> >> >
> >> > But I have a hard time on defining dCTP molecule, following the
> tutorial
> >> > http://ambermd.org/tutorials/basic/tutorial4b/.
> >> >
> >> > I use the following command to generate dCTP.pdb, which looks fine to
> me.
> >> >
> >> > reduce dCTP_orig3.pdb > dCTP.pdb
> >> >
> >> > When I try to use
> >> > antechamber -i dCTP.pdb -fi pdb -o dCTP.mol2 -fo mol2 -c bcc -s 2 -nc
> -4
> >> >
> >> > it reported error
> >> >
> >> > Running: /usr/local/amber/amber11/bin/bondtype -j full -i
> >> > ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC0 -o ANTECHAMBER_BOND_TYPE.AC -f ac
> >> > Running: /usr/local/amber/amber11/bin/atomtype -i ANTECHAMBER_AC.AC0
> -o
> >> > ANTECHAMBER_AC.AC -p gaff
> >> > Total number of electrons: 240; net charge: -4
> >> > Running: /usr/local/amber/amber11/bin/sqm -O -i sqm.in -o sqm.out
> >> > Error: cannot run "/usr/local/amber/amber11/bin/sqm -O -i sqm.in -o
> >> > sqm.out" of bcc() in charge.c properly, exit
> >> >
> >> > I look into the sqm.out, it says the following and stop at step 52
> >> >
> >> > QMMM: ERROR!
> >> > QMMM: Unable to achieve self consistency to the tolerances specified
> >> > QMMM: No convergence in SCF after 1000 steps.
> >> > QMMM: E = -0.1075E+07 DeltaE = 0.8621E+01 DeltaP = 0.5594E-01
> >> > QMMM: Smallest DeltaE = -0.1245E-03 DeltaP = 0.5847E-02 Step =
> 52
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > After I searched the archive, I change either 'tight-p-conv=0' or
> >> > 'scfconv=1.0d-8', but it still report the same error but stopped at
> step
> >> > 184.
> >> >
> >> > I don't know the syntax for setting both values though.
> >> >
> >> > I am stuck here for long time, please give me some help!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



-- 
Yangzhong Qin
Physics, OSU
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Mar 07 2013 - 07:00:02 PST
Custom Search