Re: [AMBER] possibility to increase max . num. of bonded atoms ?

From: Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:27:07 +0100

Dear prof. Case,

thanks for your additional comment !

Of course I was thinking about 4 atoms which
satisfy the right bond criteria, but thanks
also for your suggestions regarding that more
general cases.

    Best wishes,

         Marek


Dne Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:25:27 +0100 David A Case
<case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> napsal/-a:

> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013, Marek Maly wrote:
>>
>> So if one would like to add some improper torsion to group of 4 atoms
>> with known Amber atom types,
>
> I don't really agree with the previous answers. There isn't any way to
> add
> such a term as a part of the force field, since tleap will only make
> improper
> terms for a central atom bonded to exactly three other atoms. If you
> have an
> arbitrary group of 4 atoms (that doesn't fit the bonded criterion), you
> may be
> able to treat it as an "NMR" torsion restraint (although the functional
> form
> of a restraint term is not the same as the usual dihedral terms in the
> force
> field.)
>
> The other option is to edit the prmtop file (either manually, or perhaps
> via
> ParmEd) to add in the terms you want.
>
> ...good luck....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> __________ Informace od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verze databaze 8058
> (20130227) __________
>
> Tuto zpravu proveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.cz
>
>
>


-- 
Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním klientem Opery:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Feb 27 2013 - 13:00:03 PST
Custom Search