Re: [AMBER] AMBER-Tools cpptraj residue numbering incorrect

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:43:57 -0500

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Marko Wehle <Marko.Wehle.mpikg.mpg.de>wrote:

>
> Hi Daniel, indeed - in the meanwhile I was using a sed onliner to fix the
> count of residues in my scripts.
> Yes, the substructure section and the rest seems pretty correct. I'm still
> glad, that I can use the cpptraj mol2 file output.
> Because the mol2 output from top2mol2 is even worse and much harder to fix
> in an automated workflow ;)
>

FWIW, ambpdb has a -mol2 option that might get the substructure right (I
think I added that in, but it's been awhile).

All the best,
Jason

-- 
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Feb 05 2013 - 18:00:03 PST
Custom Search