Re: [AMBER] Clustering VS constant rmsd

From: George Tzotzos <gtzotzos.me.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:33:57 +0200

The apology is mine for lacking a sense of humour. I sensed it was a joke but felt I had to query the statement in case I missed something.

Regards

George


On Oct 18, 2012, at 1:39 PM, David A Case wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012, George Tzotzos wrote:
>
>> Of course, none of these reservations apply to those using Amber(tm) force
>> fields....]
>> It is not clear, at least to me, what you mean
>
> I apologize...it was meant as a joke.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Oct 18 2012 - 11:00:05 PDT
Custom Search