Re: [AMBER] To which ensemble does generalized Born trajectory fall?

From: Sajeewa Pemasinghe <sajeewasp.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:31:03 -0400

Thank you Professor Case.

Sajeewa

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 7:56 AM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012, Sajeewa Pemasinghe wrote:
> >
> > I am hoping to run production MD with generalized Born solvation scheme
> >
> >
> > I know that N (number of molecules), and T are constant. By default ntp=0
> > so I am allowing the pressure to vary. What about the volume? Can I
> > consider it to be constant or changing? The only ensemble I can think of
> > inluding the resulting trajectory is , in N,V,T . This question might
> sound
> > so naive but I really want to get my basics right.
>
> Generalized Born simulations are run in non-periodic boundary conditions,
> so there is no "volume" of the simulation; (or the effective volume is
> infinite.) There is also no pressure per se. The properties of the
> (implicit) water are probably closer to those of a constant pressure
> solvent than of a constant volume one. (My reasoning: the solute could
> change its shape and its partial molar volume without any penalty. This
> is more like the situation with constant pressure than like constant
> volume.) But if the small differences between ensembles are important to
> you, don't use an implicit solvent model.
>
> ...good luck....dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Oct 03 2012 - 07:00:02 PDT
Custom Search