Re: [AMBER] lipid11 force filed question

From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 19:26:45 -0400

Hi,

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> The TER cards should be added based on a traverse of the bond list rather
> than the ATOMS_PER_MOLECULE. Otherwise there are a substantial number of

Cpptraj in AT12 builds molecule information from bond info when
'molsearch' is specified before a 'parm' command (i.e. it ignores what
is in the prmtop). I plan on making this the default behavior in the
next release of cpptraj (this is the current behavior in the
development version). It also builds ATOMS_PER_MOLECULE whenever a
prmtop is modified (e.g. with a 'strip' command).

> So we either need to fix leap (volunteers?)

I call 'not it'.

-Dan

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon May 21 2012 - 16:30:02 PDT
Custom Search