Thanks Scott! I agree that NH4+ simulation is not a common problem, though it's not inherently stupid. I appreciate your help in tracking this issue down and fixing it :-)
B.
On 12/01/2012, at 10:47 AM, Scott Le Grand wrote:
> Fix checked in... Off to adding NH4+ SHAKE support now (in 3 years no one
> ever complained about this: Until now)...
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jan 12 2012 - 08:00:03 PST