Hi JiYuan,
On 30/12/2011, at 9:37 AM, JiYuan Liu wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I have performed antechamber a second time with the "-nc -2" flag set,I
> compared the two calib.xml,I found that the value of atmCharge=" " are
> difference for every atom in my ligand,the other parts is as same as
> before.This difference could cause to the ligand deforming in minimization?
Possibly. When you do a minimisation with energies reported every step (as I suggested in an earlier email), what do you see happening to the individual energy terms (BOND, ANGLE, etc.)?
Cheers,
Ben
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Dec 30 2011 - 07:00:03 PST
