Re: [AMBER] nonbond parameters for copper

From: ros <rodrigogalindo.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:55:04 -0600

I don't remember if that article includes non-bonded values for Cu+ and I
don't think they will be the same. Copper 1+ has a different geometry of
coordination. You can derive parameters for your particular systems with
various methods already mentioned in this list.

Good luck!

Rodrigo.

2011/12/27 gaoya <agrace.gao.gmail.com>

> Hello, thank you very much for your reply~~
> But does Cu+ have the same nonbond parametes with Cu2+ ?
>
> Best wishes!
> gao
>
> On 12/28/2011 01:34 PM, ros wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Check the work from Babu& Lim.
> >
> > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16405342
> >
> > They do an excellent work on divalent metals. I've tested the Cu2+ values
> > on several coordinated complexes and work great.
> >
> > Hope it helps!
> >
> > Rodrigo.
> >
> > 2011/12/27 gaoya<agrace.gao.gmail.com>
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >> I need the nonbond parameters for Cu2+ and Cu+, can anyone give me some
> >> suggestions? Thank you very much!
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AMBER mailing list
> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Dec 27 2011 - 22:00:03 PST
Custom Search