Hi!
I noticed that bugfix.20 is posted now! Great.
When I applied it, I got some failures. Are these serious?
$ patch -p0 -N < bugfix.20
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/cuda_info.fpp
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/gpu.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 442.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 3070.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 6772 (offset -2 lines).
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/pmemd/src/cuda/gpu.cpp.rej
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/gputypes.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 204 with fuzz 2.
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/kBNL.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 37.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 219 (offset -9 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 279 (offset -9 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 301 (offset -9 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 419 (offset -18 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 469 (offset -21 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 493 (offset -18 lines).
Hunk #10 succeeded at 515 (offset -21 lines).
Hunk #11 succeeded at 547 (offset -18 lines).
Hunk #12 succeeded at 567 (offset -21 lines).
1 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
src/pmemd/src/cuda/kBNL.h.rej
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/kCCF.h
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/kCalculateLocalForces.cu
patching file src/pmemd/src/cuda/kNeighborList.cu
I do realize that I may not have applied bugfix.18 and bugfix.19, but this
AMBERHOME only contains pmemd.cuda (and AmberTools 1.5), so I thought that
wouldn't be a problem?
Thanks,
Marc
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Dec 20 2011 - 01:30:03 PST
