ah yes, igb=8 is the one to use. it's somewhat harder to recommend only
because the paper isn't published so there isn't a lot of info to back up
the claims, but absolutely I think this is the way to go.
carlos
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:00 AM, David A Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011, Carlos Simmerling wrote:
>
> > I think the combination of the igb=7 model (with appropriate radii) and
> the
> > ff99SB force field performs well for use of GB as a water model...
>
> Can you comment on using igb=8? I've been recommending that to students?
>
> ...thx...dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Dec 08 2011 - 05:30:03 PST
