Interesting. Do you have an explanation on why the energies are so
different?
Looks like you have a poorly equilibrated system. You may want to try
short equilibration at low temperature.
What time step did you use? Any other relevant information you can provide?
--
Yong Duan, Ph.D, Professor
UC Davis Genome Center and
Department of Biomedical Engineering
University of California at Davis
Davis, CA 95616
530-754-7632
On 12/3/11 4:02 PM, "kirtana S" <skirtana4.gmail.com> wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>I ran minimization of the solvent, minimization of entire system ,
>constant
>volume equilibration and again minimization before the constant pressure
>equilibration.
>The job gets killed after this step with an error as below, is this
>something to do with my input prmtop and inpcrd files
>
>vlimit exceeded for step 1; vmax = 486.1523
>vlimit exceeded for step 2; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 3; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 4; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 5; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 6; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 7; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 8; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 9; vmax = **********
>vlimit exceeded for step 10; vmax = **********
> SANDER BOMB in subroutine nonbond_list
> volume of ucell too big, too many subcells
> list grid memory needs to be reallocated, restart sander
>
>The last step of minimization has
> FINAL RESULTS
>
> NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
> 1000 -1.2257E+05 9.7831E-01 1.2756E+02 C7 551
> BOND = 6004.1653 ANGLE = 1318.8747 DIHED =
>205.2874
> VDWAALS = 16210.2078 EEL = -153314.2089 HBOND =
>0.0000
> 1-4 VDW = 268.8998 1-4 EEL = 6739.7131 RESTRAINT =
>0.0000
>and equilibration file has
>NSTEP = 0 TIME(PS) = 0.000 TEMP(K) = 244.40 PRESS =
>2013.9
> Etot = -17407.5244 EKtot = 18506.4151 EPtot =
>-35913.9396
> BOND = 12704.4067 ANGLE = 1455.1636 DIHED =
>0.3601
> 1-4 NB = 541.0429 1-4 EEL = 6726.3304 VDWAALS =
>5828.9860
> EELEC = -63170.2293 EHBOND = 0.0000 RESTRAINT =
>0.0000
> EKCMT = 6364.7776 VIRIAL = -20026.3462 VOLUME =
>606942.3409
> Density =
>0.3860
> Ewald error estimate: 0.2325E-03
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>vlimit exceeded for step 1; vmax = 486.1523
>vlimit exceeded for step 2; vmax = **********
>
>Thanks for suggestion
>Kirtana
>On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 6:07 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011, kirtana S wrote:
>> >
>> > While running constant pressure equilibration after minimization I get
>> the
>> > following error
>> >
>> > vlimit exceeded for step 1; vmax = 365.9801
>> > vlimit exceeded for step 2; vmax = **********
>>
>> You should generally equilibrate at constant volume first, and then turn
>> on constant pressure. I note that you density is very low, but maybe
>>that
>> is what you expect here ("solvent box of monomers"). If not, check to
>>see
>> what is going on.
>>
>> The fact that such bad things happen on the first two steps may have
>> nothing
>> to do with constant pressure. Be sure that the potential energy starts
>>at
>> the
>> same place it had at the end of the minimization.
>>
>> ....dac
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER mailing list
>AMBER.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun Dec 04 2011 - 01:00:03 PST