Re: [AMBER] binding energy calculated by mm_pbsa.pl

From: Qinghua Liao <fantasticqhl.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:23:17 +0100

Dear Prof. Luo,

Thanks very much for your suggestions. I will have a try with the python
script, and if there are still problems I will send it to the mailing list.
Thanks again.

-- 
Best Regards,
Qinghua
Ph.D. student
Juelich Research Center
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
> Qinghua,
>
> Can you stay with Ambertools and use the python script? It has more
> control of input and the default is to set PB and GB calculations with
> the same input parameters.
>
> All the best,
> Ray
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Qinghua Liao <fantasticqhl.gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Dear Ray,
> >
> > Thanks very much that you can give me an answer on Sunday. I am sorry for
> > not telling you that I used amber11 together with ambertools-1.5 to do
> the
> > calculation. For the parameters, I used the default ones in the first
> > calculation. That's the point confusing me, how can this happen? How can
> I
> > figure it out? Thanks very much!
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Qinghua
> > Ph.D. student
> > Juelich Research Center
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Ray Luo, Ph.D. <ray.luo.uci.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Qinghua,
> >>
> >> For one thing, your PBSUR and GBSUR are already different -57.5 vs
> >> -9.7.Apparently you are using different parameters between the two
> >> models.
> >>
> >> Maybe I shall recommend using the latest Ambertool so it's easier to
> >> trace down your problem in the setup?
> >>
> >> All the best,
> >> Ray
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Qinghua Liao <fantasticqhl.gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Dear amber users,
> >> >
> >> > I did a binding free energy of a ligand to a protein using mm_pbsa.pl
> ,
> >> here
> >> > is the result:
> >> >
> >> > #                    DELTA
> >> > #          -----------------------
> >> > #                  MEAN        STD
> >> > #          =======================
> >> > ELE              -67.88       7.84
> >> > VDW             -66.86       3.92
> >> > INT                -0.00       0.00
> >> > GAS             -134.74       8.89
> >> > PBSUR            -57.52       1.98
> >> > PBCAL            115.17       9.15
> >> > PBSOL             57.64       9.07
> >> > PBELE             47.29       8.98
> >> > PBTOT            -77.10       9.24
> >> > GBSUR             -9.67       0.33
> >> > GB                 160.07      21.87
> >> > GBSOL            150.40      21.87
> >> > GBELE             92.20      22.30
> >> > GBTOT             15.66      22.00
> >> >
> >> > I am wondering why PBTOT can be -77.10 while GBTOT be 15.66, I think
> it
> >> > does not make sense. So how should I explain such a situation? Thanks
> >> very
> >> > muc!
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> >
> >> > Qinghua
> >> > Ph.D. student
> >> > Juelich Research Center
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > AMBER mailing list
> >> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AMBER mailing list
> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
-- 
Best Regards,
Qinghua
Ph.D. student
Juelich Research Center
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Nov 21 2011 - 23:30:03 PST
Custom Search