Dear all,
Thank you for Mark's reply.
2011/11/16 Mark Williamson <mjw.mjw.name>:
> You could try removing the -std=c++0x flag from
> ./AmberTools/src/configure and regenerate your config.h, then recompile.
> However, there must have been a reason for this flag being there in the
> first place.
Removing "-std=c++0x" flag from ./configure in AmberToosl,
I can make AmberTools binary and Amber11 binary.
First I check ambertools "make test",
500 file comparisons passed
11 file comparisons failed
0 tests experienced errors
.
Next I check test in amber(11) "make test",
365 file comparisons passed
15 file comparisons failed
18 tests experienced errors
.
"Program error" appears at
./Run.{\
1argasp.min1,1dadt.min1 ,dgdc.min1,1lysasp.min1,1polyALA.min1,
1polyAT.min1,1argasp.min1,1dadt.min1,1dgdc.min1,1lysasp.min1,
1polyALA.min1,1polyAT.min1,1argasp.min1,1dadt.min1,1dgdc.min1,
1lysasp.min1,1polyALA.min1,1polyAT.min1}
.
Message log says:
forrtl: severe (19): invalid reference to variable in NAMELIST input, unit 5,
file /usr/local/src/Amber/11-1.5.0-PT_intel/test/\
sander_pbsa_frc/dbf_0/dadt/min.in, line 10, position 29
.
This message is same as
http://archive.ambermd.org/201107/0502.html,
and Run.*.min1.* are listed in $AMBERHOME/AT15_Amber11.py-log.
Are these test logs meant that intel abmer binaries are built well?
--
K. Uebayashi
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Nov 16 2011 - 22:30:03 PST
