the offset value is specified separately in the input and isn't part
of the igb=1 specific code. it's up to the user to decide the offset
value.
not sure if that's what you meant...
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Christoph Klein <ctk3b.virginia.edu> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was trying to implement a replica of the GB model corresponding to igb=1
> (HCT with modifications by Tsui & Case). I was able to do so but got hung up
> on the parameterization for a bit.
>
> In the user manual it is stated that igb=1 is implemented "with parameters
> described by Tsui and Case". In the relevant
> paper<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11754341>,
> the offset parameter, with a default value of 0.09A, is adjusted to 0.13A.
> However, as near as I can tell, the actual implementation corresponding to
> igb=1 retains the default value of 0.09A. If this is indeed the case, I feel
> this might be a distinction worth making in the manual.
>
> Best,
> Christoph Klein
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jun 21 2011 - 11:30:04 PDT
