Hi David
Thanks for getting back to me... keeping in mind what you've said I think we'll continue on for now and I'll have a chat to the researchers about whether they will be wanting to use those features.
Thank you
Ali
On 13/06/2011, at 8:14 PM, David A Case wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011, Alison Lynton wrote:
>>
>> The Amber11 parallel compile
>> appeared to work just fine, but in the testing process it says 6 tests
>> failed - although I can only find two errors in the logs, dip and
>> noesy.
>
> The "file comparison failures" are in the *.diff file reported by the script,
> not in the log file. The number of "errors" reported in just the number of
> times the word "error" occurs in the log file, and this often overstates the
> true number of errors.
>
> Are you planning to run NMR refinements using noesy or residual dipolar
> coupling restraints? (These are very specialized options). Are you sure that
> it is essential to run such simulations in parallel? If not, you may wish to
> ignore those errors. If you do wish to pursue this, please what options you
> gave to the configure script, and what versions of compiler and OS you are
> using.
>
> ...thanks...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jun 14 2011 - 19:30:03 PDT
