Hi Marek,
Suse 11.3, like yours if I remember well:)
F.
--- On Wed, 3/30/11, Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz> wrote:
> From: Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz>
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] Amber CUDA calcualtion on GeForce GTX 590 ?
> To: "AMBER Mailing List" <amber.ambermd.org>
> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 4:48 PM
> Ian, thanks for the additional
> comment !
> Filip just for the curiosity, which linux distribution do
> you use ?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Marek
>
>
> Dne Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:09:19 +0200 Gould, Ian R <i.gould.imperial.ac.uk>
>
> napsal/-a:
>
> > Hi Marek & Filip,
> >
> > Just a quick one, you will not get a 200%-230%
> increase over a 470, you
> > will maybe see 15% increase per core since that's the
> differential
> > between 512 vs 448 cores. You have essentially two
> individual 480's
> > packaged into one card, you will get 200% increase if
> you run two jobs
> > separately, and perhaps 140% (guess from speed up seen
> with GTX295 which
> > is the same format) if you run in parallel across the
> two chips on the
> > card.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30/03/2011 12:08, "filip fratev" <filipfratev.yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marek,
> > We tried two GTX590's yesterday, but there are still
> no drivers for it
> > under Linux. Thus, I was not able to run and test
> Amber or any other
> > Cuda based program. Probably missing something?
> >
> > About the temperatures and noise I was very impressed.
> The card usually
> > has about 25C lower temperatures compared to GTX470
> (40C at normal
> > operations (50% fan speed) and 69C under full load at
> 95% fan speed.
> > However the noise at 95% fan speed is comparable to
> those produced by
> > GTX470 at 65-70%.
> > I expect 200-230% performance increase (ns/day)
> compared to GTX470, but
> > have to test, and will post the results here.
> > Don't worry about "big bang" topics, no problem with
> the card:)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Filip
> >
> >
> > --- On Wed, 3/30/11, Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Marek Maly <marek.maly.ujep.cz>
> >> Subject: [AMBER] Amber CUDA calcualtion on GeForce
> GTX 590 ?
> >> To: amber.ambermd.org
> >> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2011, 12:39 PM
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I am just wondering if someone already tried to
> run Amber
> >> cuda calculations
> >> on GeForce GTX 590.
> >>
> >> http://www.nvidia.de/object/product-geforce-gtx-590-de.html
> >>
> >> The advantage of this card is double memory and
> double
> >> number of cores
> >> comparing to GTX 480.
> >>
> >>
> >> It seems to me that they just put two chips from
> GTX 480 in
> >> one
> >> single GPU so I assume compatibility with amber as
> it is
> >> compatible with
> >> 480 version. What I am just a little afraid are
> cooling
> >> issues of such card
> >> especially for long runs ...
> >>
> >> Any experiences, comments appreciated.
> >>
> >> Best wishes,
> >>
> >> Marek
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AMBER mailing list
> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> > __________ Informace od ESET NOD32 Antivirus, verze
> databaze 5999
> > (20110330) __________
> >
> > Tuto zpravu proveril ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.cz
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Tato zpráva byla vytvořena převratným poštovním
> klientem Opery:
> http://www.opera.com/mail/
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Mar 30 2011 - 09:00:02 PDT
