Re: [AMBER] xleap or rather ff10 bug? update

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:56:04 -0500

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011, steinbrt.rci.rutgers.edu wrote:

> and to follow up on my previous mail, I absolve xleap of blame, since this
> version works:
>
> > source leaprc.ff99SB
> > foo = sequence { ALA ALA ALA }
> > impose foo { 2 } {{ N CA C N -40.0 }}
>
> as it should. Also, when ff10 is used, only those dihedral impositions
> fail that contain the backbone atom 'C'.
>
> So either I am overlooking something strange here, or there is some kind
> of bug in ff10 that prevents imposing dihedrals on peptides?

It is weird. One additional point: sleap seems to work OK with ff10 and the
above commands.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Feb 15 2011 - 15:00:03 PST
Custom Search