Re: [AMBER] ESURF term error in a one-step sander calculation

From: case <>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:08:48 -0500

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011, Yao-Chi Chen wrote:
> I run a one-step sander calculation, but the strange thing is: the ESURF
> terms of the following results are different though the difference is quite
> small. What happened?

I can't reproduce this behavior in my test cases. Which version of sander are
you using? Can you send the input files?


AMBER mailing list
Received on Tue Feb 15 2011 - 06:30:02 PST
Custom Search