Re: [AMBER] AMBER: SPCFW problems

From: case <>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:51:16 -0500

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011, Josh Berryman wrote:

> Before anyone tells me that I should have used "SPCFBOX" instead of "SPCBOX"
> (as suggested in the amberTools v1.4 manual, 2.10 "Solvent Models")...'s a typo, should be SPCFWBOX, which will indeed not include the H-H
bond in the waters.

I've added this to the errata list at


AMBER mailing list
Received on Tue Jan 25 2011 - 07:00:03 PST
Custom Search