Yes, this can be safely ignored. All of the errors in the source code have
been fixed, it failed changing a comment, which is only evidence of
disorganized patch-creation system on my part. This will be cleaner in the
future.
Good luck!
Jason
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:38 AM, bin wang <wang_p_z.yahoo.com.cn> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> When I patch the bug fixes for MMPBSA.py, it seems that one patch is
> failed. Is
> it a serious problem?
> Can I ignore it and continue to rebuild the MMPBSA.py?
> Thank you very much.
>
>
>
>
> > patch -p0 -N <mmpbsa.patch.all
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/MMPBSA.py
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/MMPBSA.py.MPI
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/mmpbsa_entropy.nab
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/Makefile
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
> src/mmpbsa_py/Makefile.rej
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/utils.py
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/MMPBSA.py.MPI
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1020 (offset -3 lines).
> patching file src/mmpbsa_py/utils.py
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 4.
> 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/mmpbsa_py/utils.py.rej
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Nov 18 2010 - 09:00:03 PST
