Hello,
Jason-Swailss-MacBook-Pro:Source swails$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.4.4
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I've had no problems with it. nab built and tested just fine. I built
gcc-4.4.4 from macports.
Good luck!
Jason
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Giorgos Lamprinidis <
lamprinidis.pharm.uoa.gr> wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I thank you for your suggestions. I found out that....
>
> There is some previous post on Jun 10 2010 from colvin who had the same
> problem with a mac computer. However he didn;t found a solution. He just
> compiled the 32bit version, since he realised that ther was some problem
> with the new gcc 64bit compilers.
> So i made some tests on other 64bit machines i have.
> 1) Quad Core Intel with gcc 4.4.1 20090725 9Red Hat 4.4.1-2), fedora core
> 11
> (2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.x86_64)
> 2) Dual Core Intel with gcc 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) , fedora core
> 9
> (2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.x86_64)
> On both machines AmberTools compiled without problems, (except tha addition
> of #include <cstdio> on ./src/gleap/mortsrc/common/fortran.cpp file) and
> passed all tests.
>
> On the machine i have the error on nab module, the gcc version is 4.4.4
> 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10) on Fedora Core 13 2.6.33.6-147.fc13.x86_64
> I manually converted
> printf( "\"%s\" is not a valid answer.\n", ParallelAnswer );
> to
> printf("\"%s\" is not a valid answer.\n", ParallelAnswer );
> (i erased the space between ( and " )
> gcc compiled it without errors, but when i run the tests....nab failed
> because the executable "nab" had errors. It means, it wasn't compiled
> correctly.
>
> Finally I downloaded from intel the icc compiler and i compiled ambertools
> using icc..... it was like a miracle....nab was compiled without a problem
> and passed all the tests. So.....can anyone tell me what is wrong with the
> latest 64bit compilers of gcc? Have you seen something similar on the past?
>
> Thanks again for your time.
>
>
> George
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "case" <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
> To: "AMBER Mailing List" <amber.ambermd.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [AMBER] Error Compiling NAB o AMBER Tools 1.2
>
>
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010, Giorgos Lamprinidis wrote:
> >>
> >> I am trying to compile AmberTools 1.2 to a new Linux machine having
> 64bit
> >> Intel Core2 vPro proc.
> >> 1) I patch the source code.
> >> 2) I run the configuration script using -gcc compiler.
> >
> >>
> >> When i search the na_anal.c file i see at line 2417 the following:
> >> 2416 else{
> >> 2417 printf( "\"%s" is not a valid answer.\n", ParallelAnswer );
> >> 2418 NotValidAnswer = 1;
> >> 2419 }
> >
> > I don't see this: my equivalent line is
> >
> > printf( "\"%s\" is not a valid answer.\n", ParallelAnswer );
> >
> > Please report the results of typing "gcc --version" and "uname -a". Also
> > check that na_anal.nab has the following line (line 2188):
> >
> > printf( "\"%s\" is not a valid answer.\n", ParallelAnswer );
> >
> > The nab2c program is just passing this line straight through to the C
> > compiler (or should be).
> >
> > [I vaguely, vaguely remember something like this popping up before, but
> > don't see anything in the archives about it...maybe someone else has a
> > better
> > memory....]
> >
> > ....dac
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jul 15 2010 - 09:00:05 PDT
