Thank you
--- On Fri, 4/23/10, Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
> From: Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
> Subject: RE: [AMBER] question about Amber Tutorial-A1
> To: "'AMBER Mailing List'" <amber.ambermd.org>
> Date: Friday, April 23, 2010, 3:04 PM
> Hi Rui,
>
> This is a typo in the tutorial caused by using a different
> set of outputs
> when generating the lib file than when creating the image
> on the webpage.
> This is on my list of things to fix once I am done with
> more pressing work.
>
> In the meantime please just use the charges you calculated
> during your Resp
> fit.
>
> All the best
> Ross
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: amber-bounces.ambermd.org
> [mailto:amber-bounces.ambermd.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Rui Li
> > Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 3:55 AM
> > To: amber.ambermd.org
> > Subject: [AMBER] question about Amber Tutorial-A1
> >
> > Dear everyone,
> > I am studying amber by the tutorial on Amber
> web.
> > In tutorial A1, I found the charge in fam5.lib(SECTION
> 3) are not
> > consistent with those in floBF-resp.chg(SECTION 1) .
> > I don't know why they are different?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Rui
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Apr 23 2010 - 22:00:02 PDT
