Re: [AMBER] slope {no reply}

From: Jio M <jiomm.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:13:44 -0800 (PST)

Dear Sir ,

(Bill Ross)



>Try it and see - allow big clearance since density will be low

>since the molecule will be placed in a grid rather than be packed



I have done this and last step of equilibration gives this:



NSTEP =   100000   TIME(PS)
=     250.000  TEMP(K) =  
299.31  PRESS =    59.6

 Etot   =      6178.0066 
EKtot   =      3863.0849 
EPtot      =     
2314.9217

 BOND   =      
674.1848  ANGLE   =     
1878.4011  DIHED     
=       425.5195

 1-4 NB =       189.5570  1-4
EEL =      4010.5437 
VDWAALS    =     -4097.2245

 EELEC  =      -766.0599 
EHBOND  =        
0.0000  RESTRAINT 
=         0.0000

 EKCMT  =       685.0976 
VIRIAL  =       563.0999 
VOLUME     =     94823.4042

                                                   
Density   
=         1.2380

 Ewald error estimate:   0.1530E-03



what conclusion can we draw from output regarding density (low or high); please suggest .

At equilibrium, the density vs time plot gives approx. constant
density. Is it sufficiently suggesting that I can use single molecule
as a solvent..



thanks and regards;

JIomm





--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] slope {no reply}
To: amber.ambermd.org
Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 5:48 PM

> 2) same query as before.. can we solubilize the system with single molecule
> instead of box solvent

Try it and see - allow big clearance since density will be low
since the molecule will be placed in a grid rather than be packed.

Bill

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Nov 16 2009 - 21:30:03 PST
Custom Search