Re: [AMBER] slope {no reply}

From: Jio M <jiomm.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:13:44 -0800 (PST)

Dear Sir ,

(Bill Ross)



>Try it and see - allow big clearance since density will be low

>since the molecule will be placed in a grid rather than be packed



I have done this and last step of equilibration gives this:



NSTEP =�� 100000�� TIME(PS)
=���� 250.000� TEMP(K) =��
299.31� PRESS =��� 59.6

�Etot�� =����� 6178.0066�
EKtot�� =����� 3863.0849�
EPtot����� =�����
2314.9217

�BOND�� =������
674.1848� ANGLE�� =�����
1878.4011� DIHED�����
=������ 425.5195

�1-4 NB =������ 189.5570� 1-4
EEL =����� 4010.5437�
VDWAALS��� =���� -4097.2245

�EELEC� =����� -766.0599�
EHBOND� =��������
0.0000� RESTRAINT�
=�������� 0.0000

�EKCMT� =������ 685.0976�
VIRIAL� =������ 563.0999�
VOLUME���� =���� 94823.4042

���������������������������������������������������
Density���
=�������� 1.2380

�Ewald error estimate:�� 0.1530E-03



what conclusion can we draw from output regarding density (low or high); please suggest .

At equilibrium, the density vs time plot gives approx. constant
density. Is it sufficiently suggesting that I can use single molecule
as a solvent..



thanks and regards;

JIomm





--- On Mon, 11/16/09, Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:

From: Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu>
Subject: Re: [AMBER] slope {no reply}
To: amber.ambermd.org
Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 5:48 PM

> 2) same query as before.. can we solubilize the system with single molecule
> instead of box solvent

Try it and see - allow big clearance since density will be low
since the molecule will be placed in a grid rather than be packed.

Bill

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Nov 16 2009 - 21:30:03 PST
Custom Search