Re: [AMBER] question with pucker in six member ring

From: Nicolas Sapay <nicolas.sapay.cermav.cnrs.fr>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:04:24 +0200

Ganesh Kamath a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
Hi Ganesh,

I can only advise you to read some litterature about the Cremer-Pople
ring puckering. This paper may also interest you:

    Haasnoot, The conformation of six-membered rings described by
    puckering coordinates derived from endocyclic torsion angles, J Am
    Chem Soc, 1992, 114, 882-887

Cheers,
Nicolas

> I am trying to calculate the pucker in a six member ring. I use this lines
> in ptraj
>
> trajin data-0.00.crd
> pucker name1 :233.C6 :233.C7 :233.N8 :233.C8A :233.C4A :233.N5 out
> puckerDHPpseudo.dat cremer offset -90.0
> pucker name2 :233.C6 :233.C7 :233.N8 :233.C8A :233.C4A :233.N5 out
> puckerDHPamp.dat cremer amplitude offset -90.0
> go
>
>
> For the amplitude I get the output
>
> 1.00 90.048991
> 2.00 90.045684
> 3.00 90.033221
> 4.00 90.094447
> 5.00 90.075243
> 6.00 90.126185
> 7.00 90.107877
> 8.00 90.065907
> 9.00 90.095487
> 10.00 90.103874
>
>
> and for pseudorotate
>
> 1.00 95.892046
> 2.00 70.439829
> 3.00 -150.576896
> 4.00 171.025833
> 5.00 165.689818
> 6.00 152.105514
> 7.00 142.713603
> 8.00 -164.182655
> 9.00 148.811860
> 10.00 150.728189
> 11.00 140.514928
> 12.00 5.599644
>
> Could some please help me understand this. thanks, ganesh
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber

Received on Fri Oct 16 2009 - 08:30:04 PDT
Custom Search