Hi Robert,
thanks for working on my problem.
First of all, I know this scale parameter thing.
I did it the right way all the time. Sorry.
This is my input file:
.GENERAL
PREFIX                snap
PATH                  ./snapshots
COMPLEX               1
RECEPTOR              1
LIGAND                1
COMPT                 ./com.top
RECPT                 ./rec.top
LIGPT                 ./lig.top 
GC                    0
AS                    0
DC                    0
MM                    1 
GB                    0
PB                    1
MS                    0
NM                    0
.PB
PROC                  3
REFE                  0
INDI                  1.0
EXDI                  80.0
SCALE                 2
LINIT                 1000
PRBRAD                1.4
ISTRNG                0.0
RADIOPT               2
DIME		      161,161,129
BCFL		      2
SRFM		      1
CHGM	    	      1
SWIN                  0.3
GAMMA                 0.105
CAVITY_SURFTEN        0.0072
CAVITY_OFFSET         0.00
SURFTEN               0.0072
SURFOFF               0.00
.MM
DIELC                 1.0
.MS
PROBE                 0.0
(I would propably change the surften and surfoff to 0.00542 and 0.92, but thats not important at the moment)
Anyway, I wanted to write you with the next error message I cannot understand.
I got it working with setting dime manually and got:
SURFTEN / SURFOFF values are not consistent across *.all.out files
File header of the *.all.out files:
==> snap_com.all.out <==
MM
PB
PB_SURFTEN 0.0072
PB_SURFOFF 0.00
1
 BOND    =      635.8445  ANGLE   =     1611.2539  DIHED      =     2167.6287
 VDWAALS =    -1543.8684  EEL     =   -13389.5724  HBOND      =        0.0000
 1-4 VDW =      710.6519  1-4 EEL =     8866.5732  RESTRAINT  =        0.0000
corrected reaction field energy:    -3487.712247
 ECAVITY =      251.7555
==> snap_lig.all.out <==
MM
PB
PB_SURFTEN 0.0072
PB_SURFOFF 0.00
1
 BOND    =       18.0452  ANGLE   =       42.3222  DIHED      =       44.4127
 VDWAALS =      -12.5880  EEL     =     -235.9055  HBOND      =        0.0000
 1-4 VDW =       30.9667  1-4 EEL =      209.1493  RESTRAINT  =        0.0000
corrected reaction field energy:     -134.380176
 ECAVITY =       25.0821
==> snap_rec.all.out <==
MM
PB
PB_SURFTEN 0.0072
PB_SURFOFF 0.00
1
 BOND    =      617.7993  ANGLE   =     1568.9317  DIHED      =     2123.2160
 VDWAALS =    -1452.1121  EEL     =   -13096.1942  HBOND      =        0.0000
 1-4 VDW =      679.6852  1-4 EEL =     8657.4238  RESTRAINT  =        0.0000
corrected reaction field energy:    -3538.290134
 ECAVITY =      261.8948
regards
Oliver
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Robert Konecny" <rok.ucsd.edu>
> Gesendet: 13.10.09 16:44:08
> An: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org>
> Betreff: Re: [AMBER] iAPBS - how to set the right grid dimensions
> Hi Oliver,
> 
> you should not set the DIME value manually - the grid dimensions are set up 
> automatically based on your SCALE parameter. However, the SCALE parameter 
> is "Lattice spacing in no. of grids per Angstrom." so you probably want to 
> set it to 2, instead of 0.5.
> 
> If you still get the atoms out of the grid error message - could you send 
> me your input files? I'll take a look at this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Robert
> 
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:36:27AM +0200, Oliver Kuhn wrote:
> > Dear iAPBS users and developers,
> > 
> > I got this error message, that my grid is to small and atoms are out of the mesh.
> > I have found this outcommented line in the mm_pbsa_createinput.pm:
> > 
> > ($dimex, $dimey, $dimez) = split(/,/,$r_del->{"DIME"});
> > 
> > Then I had to add:
> > print OUT "  dime = ${dimex}, ${dimey}, ${dimez},\n";
> > 
> > and I set
> > DIME		      161,129,129
> > in my mmpbsa input file.
> > 
> > I do not really think, that's what I'm supposed to do.
> > 
> > The question is: How do I know what dimensions to set?
> > or  Why do I have to set dimensions manually?
> > I would have to start one pdb2pqr run on one snapshot to get suggested dimensions,
> > in my case:
> > dime 161 129 129
> > cglen 101.7654 70.7540 73.9126
> > fglen 79.8620 61.6200 63.4780
> > Would I still need SCALE 0.5 when using explicit cglen and fglen?
> > I think, I could use: DIME with SCALE or DIME with CGLEN and FGLEN.
> > 
> > 
> > If I set DIME manually, how could I then set different dimensions for my protein and ligand which is much smaller?
> > 
> > 
> > Help on this is appreciated.
> > regards
> > Oliver Kuhn
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ______________________________________________________
> > GRATIS für alle WEB.DE-Nutzer: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
> > Jetzt freischalten unter http://movieflat.web.de
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> 
_______________________________________________________________
Neu: WEB.DE DSL bis 50.000 kBit/s und 200,- Euro Startguthaben!
http://produkte.web.de/go/02/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Oct 13 2009 - 08:30:02 PDT