On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Hannes
Loeffler<hannes.loeffler.stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 16:34 +0530, Arvind Marathe wrote:
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 1 340.79792
>> -0.00620 -0.08939 -0.02576 -0.00649 -0.09078 -0.02791 -0.00449
>> -0.08104 -0.03010 0.00057 -0.08734 -0.02879 -0.00762 -0.08015
>> -0.03940 -0.00491 -0.06307 -0.02141 -0.00987 -0.06287 -0.01150
>> -0.00681 -0.05934 -0.01625 -0.00150 -0.04198 -0.01913 -0.00451
>> -0.03329 -0.00936 -0.00017 -0.03949 -0.02144 0.00115 -0.03794
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> What do the numbers 1 and 340.79792 mean? After the line that gives "1
>> 340.79792", there are 325*7 + 5 = 2280 (760*3) fractional values.
>> Which of these are eigenvalues, and which are eigenvectors? Are they
>> all eigenvalues?
>
> All eigenvalues!? How many of them would you expect!?
>
> As I said, the first number in the first line is simply the number of
> the eigenmode/eigenvector. The second number is the eigenvalue itself.
> The rest is then obviously the eigenvector.
ohkk - that means the default value for the 'vecs' flag for the
'analyze' command is 1. I was under the impression that by default, it
gives all the eigenvectors and eigenvalues in descending order of
eigenvalues - hence my confusion.
>> Is this output format specified somewhere?
>
> Don't know but you should have all information now to understand the
> format.
Yes - thanks a lot.
Regards,
arvind
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 23:05:58 PDT
